tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5974969370846574917.post8877984866053208426..comments2023-06-29T00:51:31.722-07:00Comments on Zen of Zero...: The Pathetic Muhammad (pbuh)A. Zoroasterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07473665017762017780noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5974969370846574917.post-22738232739902786772012-08-26T01:32:02.077-07:002012-08-26T01:32:02.077-07:00baudil, it's difficult to communicate with som...baudil, it's difficult to communicate with someone who either can't express himself in the chosen language or who doesn't think clearly.<br /><br />You state: "If you don't believe in... life after death, you are free to do anything..." What do you mean by 'free'? No matter what you believe (in the existence of gods, in the existence of invisible flying pink elephants, whatever), you can attempt to do what you desire. In that sense, whatever you believe, "you are free to do anything". With your particular belief, you may imagine consequences of your actions (that some god will punish you for eternity if you don't do what your clerics tell you to do, that the flying spaghetti monster will dump spaghetti sauce on your head, whatever), but you are still 'free' to attempt to do what you desire, accepting the alleged consequences of your actions. As for the particular belief promoted by your clerics (to keep you in fear), zero evidence supports it: it's just a silly speculation that clerics use to keep you subservient to them.<br /><br />You state: "You haven't said anything about the Messengers killed and crusified [sic] by you." I assume you are using 'you' in a generic sense, really meaning "you Jews", since I guarantee that I, personally, have never killed any "Messengers" (and unfortunately for me, I'm not Jewish). If you are referring to the story about Jesus, in fact I've written substantial about that (e.g., see earlier posts in this series). But please think some about the claim that anyone killed any "Messenger" of any god. Given that the most reliable knowledge that humans have been able to gain, even more certain than the knowledge that we exist (for we may all be just simulations in some humongous computer game) is that there are no gods (and never were any gods), then there never have been any "Messengers" of any god: they were just either mentally disturbed people (hearing voices, seeing visions, megalomaniacs, etc.) or con artists (parasites on the producers of the world).<br /><br />You state: "It is your hatred that you didn't [sic] believe in Mohammad [sic]... because he belonged to the Arabs and not your geneological [sic] national fraction [sic]." Do try to express yourself more clearly! What do you mean "believe in Mohammad [sic]": that he existed or that he was a "Messenger" of some god? And what are you suggesting is the object of my alleged "hatred": that someone who was mentally unstable claimed to be a "Messenger" of some god or that the person horribly violated basic norms of interpersonal morality? Further, what evidence do you have that I recognize any genealogical faction? Do you know anything about Humanism?<br /><br />And finally you state "The incident that took place in London, you know, and depicting as you don't know..." I'm sorry, I still don't know what you're talking about, but I now notice that you're calling me a liar, and I do know that I'll not try to communicate with you further.A. Zoroasterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07473665017762017780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5974969370846574917.post-90432988600438308212012-08-20T14:13:13.630-07:002012-08-20T14:13:13.630-07:00The game is finished. If you don,t believe in the...The game is finished. If you don,t believe in the life after death, you are free to do anything, and you are doing too. You haven,t said anything about the Messengers killed and crusified by you. Also, melooks you are an atheist(unbeliever in any God) then feel yourself free. It is your hatred that you didn,t believe in Mohammad P>B>U>H> because he belonged to the Arabs and not your geneological national fraction. The incident that took place in London, you know, and depicting as you don,t know, the whole world was grateful to those 2 martyrs to save the lives of 2 Christians..Oops, u,lln,t digest.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05134742626779973278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5974969370846574917.post-68347808222176925092012-08-17T12:16:32.011-07:002012-08-17T12:16:32.011-07:00No, Buadil, it's not a "campaign against ...No, Buadil, it's not a "campaign against Muslims, Islam, and the Holy Prophet". It's a "campaign" against ignorance, which is the essence of all organized religions, ignorance that clerics manipulate to make their followers afraid.<br /><br />And no, "the might they [have] nowadays is [not] the booty and lootings from their imperialism." Witness the weaknesses of Muslim nations, which obviously haven't similarly prospered from their own "booty and lootings from their imperialism". I'd suggest, instead, that "the might they [have] nowadays" is from the productivity of a free people no longer overwhelmingly encumbered by clerical parasites. To be similarly free, you must first gain the courage to confront your fears and reject your clerics' balderdash. <br /><br />And still another "no": the West doesn't want to "capture Muslim resources and their wealth". We've been paying an outrageous price for the one resource of interest in some Muslim nations (i.e., petroleum). It's an outrageous price, because the producers have formed a morally bankrupt cartel - but we're paying the price, without invading any Muslim country "to capture Muslim resources and their wealth".<br /><br />As for killing "millions of people around the world in the hypocritical name of democracy and human rights", in my lifetime, the wars fought by the U.S. have been against aggressors (e.g., Nazi Germany, Imperialist Japan, North Korea, North Vietnam, Iraq, al Qaeda). That, as a result, some of those aggressors (particularly, Germany and Japan) have developed respect for human rights shows some of the benefits when people rule themselves (i.e., democracy).<br /><br />As for your reference to "Muslims who sacrificed their lives in England rescuing English people", I'm sorry, but I don't know what you're referring to.<br /><br />Finally, with respect to "Allah's wrath" and "Hell", I'm sorry that you didn't get the message: there are no gods (and never were any) and there is no afterlife (so, not to dream about Heaven or worry about Hell). It's all a mountainous lie, perpetrated by clerical parasites, so they can leech off the producers of the world.A. Zoroasterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07473665017762017780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5974969370846574917.post-67704226941066263822012-08-17T09:44:32.700-07:002012-08-17T09:44:32.700-07:00buadilmohsin@gmail.com, it seems to be a campaign ...buadilmohsin@gmail.com, it seems to be a campaign against Muslims Islam and the Holy Prophet p.b.u.h.that "hurt them, their hearts and their Love with the Prophet, as they had been assisinating and killing crusifying their messengers. The Might they got now-a-days is the booty and lootings from their imperialism. They want to capture Muslim resources and their wealth, have killed millions of people around the world in the hypocratic name of democracy and Human Rights. What about those Muslims who sacrificed their lives in England rescuing English people, 'cause they were Pakistani? Go to the Hell you all and your agents, soon you'll face Allaha's wrath.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05134742626779973278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5974969370846574917.post-6914157785894566242012-04-17T01:43:51.693-07:002012-04-17T01:43:51.693-07:00Saying something is so doesn't make it so. Yo...Saying something is so doesn't make it so. You state "there is no immorality in the religion itself." In contrast, if you'll read the next two posts in this series, you'll see that I provide both reasons and evidence for my conclusion that Islam is, not only immoral, but plunges to the depth of immorality, i.e., it's evil.<br /><br />But even if you don't go through all the details that I provide in the next two posts, the evil in Islam (and all organized religions) can be seen by applying Socrates' idea: "There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance." Thus, the essence of Islam (and all the Abrahamic religions) is that there's some magic man in the sky who created the universe and all life and who is to be worshiped. As I show in my book (at http://zenofzero.net/ ), that idea is a contender for the most ignorant (and therefore, according to Socrates, the most evil) concept ever concocted.<br /><br />In contrast to such ignorance (as I show in my book's Chapter Ii, entitled "Indoctrination in Ignorance and available at http://zenofzero.net/docs/IiIndoctrinationinIgnorance.pdf ), the most certain knowledge (and therefore, according to Socrates, the epitome of "good") that humans have been able to gain (even more certain than the knowledge that we exist, for we all may be just simulations in a humongous computer games) is that there are no gods (and never were any).<br /><br />In contrast to such ignorance and as I outline in my book's first (http://zenofzero.net/docs/Awareness.pdf ) and final (http://zenofzero.net/docs/Z_The_Zen_of_Zero.pdf ) chapters, the universe appears to have created itself via a symmetry-breaking quantum-like fluctuation in a total void, which then led to inflation (commonly called "the Big Bang"). All evidence also points to the validity of the idea that life evolved, by itself, after the first self-replicating molecules encoded information about their environments.<br /><br />I would agree, however, with your suggestion that religion is used as "part of [a] big game of power & money." But your comment that "Quran is a book of ALLAH and authenticity is that it has answer to all basic questions" is, I'm sorry to say, an example of your own ignorance - with which you obviously attempt to perpetrate more evil.<br /><br />But I don't expect to be able to get through your indoctrination, so you'll realize that there are no gods and never were any. Such a realization would require you to start thinking for yourself, which I expect is now beyond your capabilities. As others have described, you're apparently now another "parrot, on a dead branch of knowledge, endlessly repeating the same old lines."A. Zoroasterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07473665017762017780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5974969370846574917.post-4924540684063037772012-04-16T20:27:18.665-07:002012-04-16T20:27:18.665-07:00There is no immorality in the religion itself. Thi...There is no immorality in the religion itself. This immorality is a part of big game i.e. power & money. Islam is a very simple religion. People made in complicated to gain power and money. Killing people is not Islam. Quran is book of ALLAH and authenticity is that it has answer to all basic question. But who understands it don't want that the people should also understand because he will loose control over people.<br /><br />that is why people brought in fake history to confuse people and take them to wrong pathAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5974969370846574917.post-27257591814470280112012-04-16T20:18:39.426-07:002012-04-16T20:18:39.426-07:00Hi,
Criticising someone is easy, we all know how ...Hi,<br /><br />Criticising someone is easy, we all know how history is made. One has to learn the basics before commenting. If you read Quran it tells you how our behaviours effect the outcome. If some historians have proppogated wrong facts that dosen't mean that we start criticising it. You ask me any question and i will reply back as Quran has solution to everything, but the question ha to be goodAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5974969370846574917.post-77437016818640423532010-07-31T08:13:10.717-07:002010-07-31T08:13:10.717-07:00I appreciate your anger and frustration, and altho...I appreciate your anger and frustration, and although you no doubt realize complications related to your question, maybe the following comments will be useful.<br /><br />In the enlightened world, the bedrock of personal morality is to choose to live. Thereby, if a wild animal attacks you (according to its own application of the same moral code, since it seeks to preserve and prolong its own life), your application of that moral code impels you to kill it before it kills you. All life claims its innate right to live; it's "programmed" into our DNA; life not so programmed is now extinct.<br /><br />Unfortunately for humanity, however, some Muslims (and other fanatics) choose death over life. Witness the statement (frequently repeated by many of today's Muslim extremists) that the commander of Muslim forces reportedly sent to the commander of the Persians at the Battle of Qadisiyya in 663:<br /><br />"You… should convert to Islam, and then you will be safe, for if you don't, you should know that I have come to you with an army of men that love death, as you love life."<br /><br />Thus, some ideologies manage to re-program people, to choose death over life, overriding their innate programming, destroying the bedrock of their morality. The result is that the behavior of such re-programmed people, such automatons, such psychopaths, is more immoral than the behavior of wild beasts. <br /><br />But the huge complication associated with your question is, of course, the need to identify the Muslims (and others) that have lost their natural sense of morality. Probably the majority of Muslims, born into their religion, just "go through the motions" of Islam, unaware of its "dark side" glorifying death.<br /><br />As a result, in response to your question, I'd say: "No, it isn't self defense to kill Muslims; it's indiscriminate murder." On the other hand, if someone more immoral than a wild beast attempts to kill you, then certainly it's moral to kill them in self defense. Consequently, protect yourself, but discriminate. <br /><br />In the U.S., we maintain the right to bear arms. If a similar right isn't recognized in Sweden, you might want to agitate to acquire it. And of course I'd agree that it's dangerous to wait for psychopaths to identify themselves, but it's one of the prices we pay for civilization. The alternative of indiscriminately murdering Muslims is uncivilized.<br /><br />In sum, there's no immorality in using violence: the immorality is in initiating violence – or even threatening to do so. If you have been threatened, contact your police.A. Zoroasterhttp://zenofzero.net/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5974969370846574917.post-59835485639898834912010-07-31T02:37:10.244-07:002010-07-31T02:37:10.244-07:00From Sweden.
muslims want to kill Sweden artists s...From Sweden.<br />muslims want to kill Sweden artists so FUCK them.<br />If muslims kill Sweden artists, is it self defense to kill muslims?<br />Help to cure muslim children from islam and send them this info to them, "prophet" mohammed was haram.<br />Girls read quran sura bina 60.<br />When "prophet" mohammed was 50 year old he marry Aisha a 6 year old child and when Aisha was 9 "prophet" mohammed rape Aisha so he was a fucking pedophile and a slave owner so fuck him.<br />Watch and read mohammed T-shirt art from Sweden at,<br />http://www.mohammedt-shirt.com<br />Not mine ip nrAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com